Twitter   RSS   Email  

Curtis Ophoven's eBooks

 How the Global Economy is Dependent on Christianity


 Why America May Never Recover From the Recession


 Save Money Homeschooling


Obama Flip-Flops on Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Claiming it’s a Tax as Lawsuits Reveal its Unconstitutionality

By: Curtis Ophoven

7/20/2010 - 8 Comments

Throughout his presidential campaign, then-candidate Barack Obama promised the American people: “If you’re a family that’s making $250,000 a year or less, you will see no increase in your taxes.

Yet sixteen days into his Presidency he signed a cigarette tax increase, which targeted families making under $250,000 a year.

During the presidential debates and the passage of the Health Care Reform Bill, Obama continued to claim that he was not going to tax ‘the little guy’.

Here is a video of Obama deigning that the health care mandate is a tax increase.

But now that Obamacare is facing major legal battles and is clearly unconstitutional, the White House is called the health care mandate a TAX.  Not only is this a clear flip-flop by the President but it is a direct contradiction to his campaign promise to not raise taxes on ‘the little guy’.

Clearly Obama does not have 'the little guy’ is mind with his job destroying agenda and as he continues to drive the economy into a deepening recession.

President Obama's disapproval rating is at 56%.  According to the rating experts, once a Presidents disapproval rating hits 60% they can no longer effectively govern. 

Copyright © 2010 PennyJobs.com. All rights reserved.

<< FREE >> Weekly Newsletter...

Signup today and start receiving our free weekly newsletter!

Reader Comments

Comment 1
Jen Says: on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 8:40:07 AM

GOP Should Oppose Obama Without Compromise

http://www.newsmax.com/Limbaugh/GOP--Obama--compromise--Obamacare--financial--overhaul--Ronald--Reagan--Kagan--Bush/2010/07/19/id/365079

Comment 2
David Says: on Saturday, July 24, 2010 7:00:17 AM

well, that's what most American deserve since they voted him in.

Some of us already prepared a sentence that can be used over and over during the four years: I've told you so.


Comment 3
Unique Solutions Says: on Saturday, July 24, 2010 7:38:18 AM

A City w/ population of 50,000. Outsources Everything. Sky Doesn’t Fall.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/business/20maywood.html?_r=3
Chalk up another Maywood resident who approves of this city’s unusual experience in municipal governing. City officials last month fired all of Maywood’s employees and outsourced their jobs.

While many communities are fearfully contemplating extensive cuts, Maywood says it is the first city in the nation in the current downturn to take an ax to everyone.

The school crossing guards were let go. Parking enforcement was contracted out, City Hall workers dismissed, street maintenance workers made redundant. The public safety duties of the Police Department were handed over to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.


Comment 4
Mo Says: on Saturday, July 24, 2010 7:53:13 AM

http://www.forbes.com/2010/07/14/world-happiest-countries-lifestyle-realestate-gallup-table.html
Does Money buy happiness? This Forbes list of the 155 top happiesty countries says so. Europe rules!


Comment 5
Fuggly Says: on Saturday, July 24, 2010 8:16:45 AM

Obama's approval rating is still higher than Bush's was. Keep the Change man.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/141512/Congress-Ranks-Last-Confidence-Institutions.aspx?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=syndication&utm_content=morelink&utm_term=Business%20-%20Congress%20-%20Education%20-%20Government%20-%20Healthcare%20-%20Media%20-%20Military%20-%20Politics%20-%20Religion%20-%20Supreme%20Court%20-%20The%20Presidency%20-%20USA
The Gallup poll was conducted July 8-11, shortly before Congress passed a major financial regulatory reform bill, which President Obama signed into law this week.

Underscoring Congress' image problem, half of Americans now say they have "very little" or "no" confidence in Congress, up from 38% in 2009 -- and the highest for any institution since Gallup first asked this question in 1973. Previous near-50% readings include 48% found for the presidency in 2008, and 49% for the criminal justice system in 1994.

This year's poll also finds a 15-point drop in high confidence in the presidency, to 36% from 51% in June 2009. Over the same period, President Barack Obama's approval rating fell by 11 points, from 58% to 47%. However, confidence in the presidency remains higher than in 2008 -- the last year of George W. Bush's term -- when the figure was 26%.


Comment 6
Steve Says: on Sunday, August 08, 2010 9:24:34 PM

Liberty Wins First Skirmish in the Obamacare Legal Battle!!!

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2010/08/03/liberty-wins-first-skirmish-in-the-obamacare-legal-battle/
Posted by Ilya Shapiro

"As Michael already noted, Judge Henry Hudson of the Eastern District of Virginia denied the government’s motion to dismiss Virginia’s legal challenge to Obamacare. Notably, Judge Hudson agreed with Cato senior fellow Randy Barnett (see here, here, and here) that the government’s assertion of Commerce Clause authority for the individual mandate is unprecedented:

The guiding precedent is informative, but inconclusive. Never before has the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause been extended this far. At this juncture, the court is not persuaded that the Secretary has demonstrated a failure to state a cause of action with respect to the Commerce Clause element.

And that goes for the government’s arguments generally:

While this case raises a host of complex constitutional issues, all seem to distill to the single question of whether or not Congress has the power to regulate–and tax–a citizen’s decision not to participate in interstate commerce. Neither the U.S. Supreme Court nor any circuit court of appeals has squarely addressed this issue. No reported case from any federal appellate court has extended the Commerce Clause or Tax Clause to include the regulation of a person’s decision not to purchase a product, notwithstanding its effect on interstate commerce. Give the presence of some authority arguably supporting the theory underlying each side’s position, this Court cannot conclude at this time stage that the Complaint fails to state a cause of action."

In other words, at this first, early stage of litigation, Virginia’s lawsuit survives and the government has a real fight on its hands

Comment 8
Government controls birth to death Says: on Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:09:05 PM

http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/local_news/new_jersey/uninsured-slow-to-sign-up-for-coverage-20100823-apx
Only two people signed up for FREE Obamacare in New Jersey!


Write a Comment

Please keep comments civil and on-topic. Abusive or inappropriate comments will be removed without warning.

 Name (required)   
 Email Address (required)   
 Website URL 
Comment  
 

Related Articles

  • Obama’s Student Loan Reform is a Marxist Idea that Will Push the Economy Further into the Abyss
  • I was talking to a friend of mine yesterday who has a child in college and she was excited about Obama’s new student loan reform after reading an article that explained how the reform will save $68 billion and help to lower the cost that students pay on interest for their college loans. Read More...
  • Government Expansion Will Only Increase Poverty
  • The current government expansion will increase the rate of poverty, while decreasing the wealth of our nation. Read More...
  • 10 Reasons Why the Economic Stimulus Package was a Complete Failure
  • At the beginning of the year Obama said that if we didn’t pass his economic stimulus package that unemployment could reach 8 percent. Read More...
  • It Turns Out that Obamacare is Illegal and In Direct Violation of the Constitution, as the Lawsuits Stack Up Against It
  • The newest legal case against Obamacare puts the language of the Constitution against the language of the National Health Care Reform Bill. Read More...
  • Obamacare Hindsight, a Closer Look at What We Are Getting
  • The Health Reform Bill that Congress is desperately trying to pass is nothing like it was intended to be.  Read More...
Meltdown: A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed, the Economy Tanked, and Government Bailouts Will Make Things Worse

In discussions of today's economic meltdown and what to do about it, the Federal Reserve is a stealth helicopter: it never shows up on the radar. With the exception of a few esoteric specialists and those Ron Paul Revolutionaries who burst into chants of "Abolish the Fed!" Historian Thomas Woods notes in this important book, the Federal Reserve bears a large part of the blame for the mess we're in. In the first part of "Meltdown," Woods shows how both in theory and in practice, Fed policy fueled an artificial boom and is now leading us to a much larger meltdown.

How Capitalism Saved America

This book is an excellent presentation on the problems of government 'regulations' into free market mechanisms. This book illustrates simply and clearly how many chaotic economic problems were caused by interference from government regulations and how capitalism has overcome them. Master this book and you have overcome most of the bad economic thinking of our time. Government is the cause of capitalism failure.

Energy Victory: Winning the War on Terror by Breaking Free of Oil

Ethanol is perhaps the best strategy to reduce our dependence on oil. Flex-fuel technology has already been developed by an inventive woman engineer at Ford named Roberta Nichols, enabling an engine to run on any mixture of alcohol or gasoline. Our oil money is the primary source of revenue for the terror supporting nations like Saudi Arabia, Iran and Venezuela. With the rising price of gas, ethanol is now cost effective to produce and a strong weapon against the terrorist.

The Case Against the Fed

This book, written by Murray Rothbard, an economist and historian of fairly well known repute, is a scathing attack on not only the Federal Reserve, but the interests that created this institution. Rothbard explains how the Federal Reserve is the true source in the destruction of wealth, which has led to the destruction of the middle class and continues to sift money into the hands of the wealthiest.