Twitter   RSS   Email  
 

Curtis Ophoven's eBooks

 How the Global Economy is Dependent on Christianity


 Why America May Never Recover From the Recession


 Save Money Homeschooling


Free Market Principles Provide the Cultural Mandate for a Peaceful and Stable Economy

By: Curtis Ophoven

4/22/2010 - 55 Comments

Economic policy guides human ethics.  Bad economic policy guides humans into making unethical actions, which leads to further bad policies to try to protect people from unethical actions of other people. 

The result of bad economic policy leads to a deteriorating economy and social unrest as bad policies provides cover for one group of people to trample on another group of people – legally stealing their property, labor and freedom. 

Bad economic policies support unjust actions on just people, which cause them to take unethical actions to right the unjust that has been portrayed on them.  In the name of equality and fairness, government policies are the primiary source of inequality and unfairness.

A strong commitment to free market principles reduced the passage of bad economic policies that create injustice and reduce the need to create more policies to protect people from further unethical actions.

Free Market = Ethical Culture

Therefore a strong commitment to free market principles creates the critical element of rewarding ethics within the culture that is needed for a prosperous economy.

Culture is the key to economic prosperity as proven by the history of America.  But that culture is eroding because our governmental leadership no longer has a strong commitment to free market principles.

As our winning culture that motivated hard work and ethical actions deteriorates because of bad economic policies that destroy the free market, America cannot expect to remain a prosperous nation. 

America is not in decline because other nations like China and India are growing in strength or any other reason.

America is declining because we have a deteriorating ethnical business environment, created and supported by our growing anti-capitalism government policies.

Our anti-capitalism government policies are the source of our decline as the Tea Party movement has rightly pointed out.

The path to economic recovery begins with repealing the many anti-capitalism government policies that this administration and Congress has passed and continue to propose. 

Sometimes it is not easy to identify bad economic policies because they are created with such good sounding intentions and backed by powerful lobbyist and special interest groups, but none the less they must be repealed. 

If not, the unintended negative consequences of anti-free market policies will continue to destroy the economy.

Policies that should be fought and repealed include pretty much any interference with the market process: minimum wages, price controls, taxes, tariffs, and most subsidies should all be repealed.

The true hope of our economic recovery rests with the new political leadership that we so desperately need to repeal everything on the agenda of the current administration.

Copyright © 2013 PennyJobs.com. All rights reserved.

<< FREE >> Weekly Newsletter...

Signup today and start receiving our free weekly newsletter!

Reader Comments

Comment 1
Chang Says: on Friday, April 23, 2010 7:06:28 PM

Brace Yourself, China Is Finally Removing Its Stimulus

http://www.businessinsider.com/brace-yourself-china-is-removing-its-stimulus-2010-4


Comment 2
Peacethrough Superior Firepower Says: on Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:48:12 AM

"Launch of secret US space ship masks even more secret launch of new weapon Michael Evans, Pentagon Correspondent.

The X-37B sits on top of an Atlas V rocket
Somewhere above earth is America’s latest spaceship, a 30ft craft so classified that the Pentagon will not divulge its mission nor how much it cost to build.

The mysterious X37B, launched successfully by the US Air Force from Cape Canaveral on Thursday, using an Atlas V rocket, looks like a mini-Space Shuttle — but its mission is top secret.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7106714.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797093


Comment 3
sally Says: on Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:38:05 PM

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/if-the-u-s-economy-goes-into-the-toilet-will-it-result-in-a-complete-and-total-collapse-of-society
"now former U.S. President Bill Clinton is comparing Tea Party members to Timothy McVeigh.

Considering the fact that Timothy McVeigh received the death penalty, that is a very frightening parallel for Clinton to draw.

Does Clinton actually believe that Tea Party protesters should receive the same treatment as McVeigh?

Even more alarming is new legislation being pushed in the U.S. Senate. A new bill introduced by Senators John McCain and Joe Lieberman would allow the U.S. military to round up large numbers of Americans and detain them indefinitely without a trial if they "pose a threat" or if they have "potential intelligence value" or for any other reason the President of the United States "considers appropriate".

The reality is that as "necessary" as bills like that may seem to many as we edge ever closer to the breakdown of society, the reality is that the United States is quickly becoming just like so many of the other horrific totalitarian regimes that we have seen rise throughout the 20th and 21st centuries.

In fact a time may soon be coming when authorities in the U.S. may soon be able to legally utter this bone chilling phrase: "Your Papers Please!" Lawmakers in Washington D.C. working to create a new immigration "reform" bill have decided on a way to prevent employers from hiring illegal immigrants: a national biometric identification card that all American workers would be required to obtain.

Can you imagine being forced to carry around a national identification card?

Or worse?

A startup company developing "chipless RFID ink" has already tested its product on cattle and laboratory rats.

Could one day we all be required to sport an "RFID tatoo" to prove our identity to authorities?"



Comment 5
Steve Says: on Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:46:51 PM

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/insights-americas-disneyland-mike-krieger-and-our-neo-feudalistic-gulag-casino-economy
Why Extending Unemployment Benefits is Inflationary and Why Food Stamps = Bread Lines


Comment 7
Gabriael Says: on Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:17:35 PM

Angel investors outlawed by new bill:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article18744.html

Comment 8
George Says: on Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:31:59 PM

Is this a preview of what is to come in the USA?

Iceland reports record 34 percent inflation
Inflation is up overall in Europe, especially in Iceland, which experienced a 2-year cumulative increase of 36 percent.

http://www.csmonitor.com/Money/Stefan-Karlsson-s-Blog/2010/0420/Iceland-reports-record-34-percent-inflation



Comment 9
Dunstan Says: on Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:36:21 PM

At least you living in USA do not have your private home wi-fi networks mapped for the CIA to supenoa:


"There is a specter haunting Europe. Nope, not that one, but several European nations have expressed concern about Google’s slow but steady encroachment on citizens’ privacy protections. Now the search behemoth is in hot water with Germans for using its wandering Street View cars to log the location of private WLAN networks and media access control (MAC) addresses in that country.

Germany’s data protection chief said he was “horrified” by the discovery – which has been rumored for a while now – and called on Google to delete what he claims was unlawfully collected personal data from wireless networks, as well as to cease cruising German streets for Street View."

http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-04/google-catches-flak-mapping-wlan-networks-mac-addresses-europe


Comment 10
Carter Says: on Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:43:17 PM

Now that your Pres. Obama nationalized your healthcare like us Brits, you have this to look forward to!

"The British Medical Association is so worried it wants the new system suspended."

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-1267892/Putting-health-records-national-NHS-database-save-lives-deeply-disturbing-questions-remain.html
Anyone's medical record is for sale & available for a price...

Comment 11
Harold Says: on Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:46:53 PM

Dunstan you should be more concerned about the drones than Google's spying!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1268535/Superspy-sky-soon-patrolling-British-cities-search-hidden-terror-cells.html
"A Top-secret US unmanned drone used to locate Al Qaeda and Taliban hideouts in Pakistan and Afghanistan could soon be patrolling over British cities to search for
hidden terror cells.

The controversial move would allow MI5 and GCHQ, the Government's eavesdropping centre, to step up surveillance operations over the UK. Until now, the £23million Global Hawk aircraft has not been available for foreign sale.

However, US policy has been quietly changed and Britain is now negotiating to buy the drones. America is keen to supply them for British patrols after a string of terror plots threatening the US and its citizens.

These include the attempt in 2006 to detonate liquid bombs on aircraft flying to American cities from the UK. It is not known how many drones the UK wants from manufacturer Northrop Grumman, but earlier this year a senior Ministry of Defence procurement official visited the Pentagon to begin negotiations.

Britain would not need to use the drones in Afghanistan and Pakistan because the US already provides full air coverage in the region. Instead, it is believed they will be used mainly for domestic surveillance.

The drones are also being deployed by the US Navy in the Caribbean and off the Florida coast to combat drug smuggling. In Britain, MI5 and GCHQ already use three planes based at RAF Northolt in North-West London to spy on citizens.

The three Britten-Norman Islander aircraft are all fitted with sophisticated surveillance equipment. They have been used to track down terror cells and to locate former Afghan veterans who may have returned to Britain to plot terror attacks.

The aircraft are able to identify suspects using 'voice-prints' of insurgents with British accents that were picked up by spy planes monitoring Taliban radio signals in Afghanistan.

One stumbling block is that permission from the Civil Aviation Authority would be needed to fly the drones in already congested UK airspace. Although the CAA gave the MoD permission to fly another drone over parts of Wales earlier this month, it is understood to be against regular flights because of safety fears.

However, the Global Hawk recently became the first drone to be certified by the American Federal Aviation Authority for use in civilian air corridors with no advance notice.

The drone can stay airborne for 30 hours without refuelling. Last night, MoD sources said the Global Hawk was being looked at for possible military use but any decision to buy the drone would depend on funding.


Comment 12
Schmitty Says: on Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:48:41 PM

No, this is a preview of what will go down in the USA:

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB127193332870480995.html?mod=BOL_hpp_dc
WHAT IF THEY GAVE a bond auction and nobody came?

"That is the ultimate doomsday scenario with the unprecedented fiscal deficits around the world -- that governments' credit lines could run out and they couldn't raise the cash they needed in the bond markets. At that point, after bailing out banks that had faced the same dilemma, who's there to bail out the governments?

That hasn't happened in Greece, ground zero in the European debt crisis. Earlier this week, Greece found ready and willing buyers for its short-term bills, albeit at yields twice what the government had to pay just a few months ago.

It was Germany that didn't receive sufficient bids to sell all the bonds it offered. In other words, the auction failed."


Comment 13
Plinker Says: on Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:52:48 PM

Socialism vs Corporatism
by Ron Paul

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul665.html
"Lately many have characterized this administration as socialist, or having strong socialist leanings. I differ with this characterization. This is not to say Mr. Obama believes in free-markets by any means. On the contrary, he has done and said much that demonstrates his fundamental misunderstanding and hostility towards the truly free market. But a closer, honest examination of his policies and actions in office reveals that, much like the previous administration, he is very much a corporatist. This in many ways can be more insidious and worse than being an outright socialist.

Socialism is a system where the government directly owns and manages businesses. Corporatism is a system where businesses are nominally in private hands, but are in fact controlled by the government. In a corporatist state, government officials often act in collusion with their favored business interests to design polices that give those interests a monopoly position, to the detriment of both competitors and consumers.

A careful examination of the policies pursued by the Obama administration and his allies in Congress shows that their agenda is corporatist. For example, the health care bill that recently passed does not establish a Canadian-style government-run single-payer health care system. Instead, it relies on mandates forcing every American to purchase private health insurance or pay a fine. It also includes subsidies for low-income Americans and government-run health care “exchanges.” Contrary to the claims of the proponents of the health care bill, large insurance and pharmaceutical companies were enthusiastic supporters of many provisions of this legislation because they knew in the end their bottom lines would be enriched by Obamacare.


Similarly, Obama's “cap-and-trade” legislation provides subsidies and specials privileges to large businesses that engage in “carbon trading.” This is why large corporations, such as General Electric support cap-and-trade.

To call the President a corporatist is not to soft-pedal criticism of his administration. It is merely a more accurate description of the President’s agenda.

When he is a called a socialist, the President and his defenders can easily deflect that charge by pointing out that the historical meaning of socialism is government ownership of industry; under the President’s policies, industry remains in nominally private hands. Using the more accurate term – corporatism – forces the President to defend his policies that increase government control of private industries and expand de facto subsidies to big businesses. This also promotes the understanding that though the current system may not be pure socialism, neither is it free-market since government controls the private sector through taxes, regulations, and subsidies, and has done so for decades.

Using precise terms can prevent future statists from successfully blaming the inevitable failure of their programs on the remnants of the free market that are still allowed to exist. We must not allow the disastrous results of corporatism to be ascribed incorrectly to free market capitalism or used as a justification for more government expansion. Most importantly, we must learn what freedom really is and educate others on how infringements on our economic liberties caused our economic woes in the first place. Government is the problem; it cannot be the solution."


Comment 15
Giblet Says: on Thursday, April 29, 2010 7:30:13 PM

http://dailybail.com/home/bill-moyers-with-simon-johnson-james-kwak-the-13-bankers-who.html?utm_source=patrick.net
With all due respect, we can only wish those tea party activists who gathered this week were not so single-minded about just who's responsible for their troubles, real and imagined. They're up in arms, so to speak, against big government, especially the Obama administration.

But if they thought this through, they'd be joining forces with other grassroots Americans who will soon be demonstrating in Washington and elsewhere against high finance, taking on Wall Street and the country's biggest banks.

The original Tea Party, remember, wasn't directed just against the British redcoats. Colonial patriots also took aim at the East India Company. That was the joint-stock enterprise originally chartered by the first Queen Elizabeth. Over the years, the government granted them special rights and privileges, which the owners turned into a monopoly over trade, including tea.

It may seem a stretch from tea to credit default swaps, but the principle is the same: when enormous private wealth goes unchecked, regular folks get hurt - badly. That's what happened in 2008 when the monied interests led us up the garden path to the great collapse.

Suppose the Tea Party folk had dropped by those Senate hearings this week looking into the failure of Washington Mutual. That's the bank that went belly up during the meltdown in September 2008. It was the largest such failure in American history.

WaMu, as we were reminded this week, made sub-prime loans that its executives knew were rotten, then packaged them as mortgage securities, and pawned them off on unsuspecting investors.



Comment 17
Penny Lane Says: on Thursday, April 29, 2010 7:42:50 PM

A penny for your thought has met inflation - pennies soon to be outlawed and no longer produced.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/senators-give-p%20enny-some-thought/article1549439/
“The committee will not stop honourable senators from earning or spending a pretty penny … Unfortunately, you can no longer trade them for a package of sunshine and flowers because, under the Currency Act, no florist or party to any transaction is obliged to accept the payment of more than 25 cents in pennies.”


Comment 18
Water wars are a comin Says: on Friday, April 30, 2010 6:07:22 PM


http://www.slate.com/id/2251547/
Warming in America
Mass migrations, water wars, and insect plagues. How will climate change reshape the electoral map?


 
Comment 55
sluyena Says: on Friday, July 22, 2011 9:52:15 PM

thankyou

Write a Comment

Please keep comments civil and on-topic. Abusive or inappropriate comments will be removed without warning.

 Name (required)   
 Email Address (required)   
 Website URL 
Comment  
 
Meltdown: A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed, the Economy Tanked, and Government Bailouts Will Make Things Worse

In discussions of today's economic meltdown and what to do about it, the Federal Reserve is a stealth helicopter: it never shows up on the radar. With the exception of a few esoteric specialists and those Ron Paul Revolutionaries who burst into chants of "Abolish the Fed!" Historian Thomas Woods notes in this important book, the Federal Reserve bears a large part of the blame for the mess we're in. In the first part of "Meltdown," Woods shows how both in theory and in practice, Fed policy fueled an artificial boom and is now leading us to a much larger meltdown.

How Capitalism Saved America

This book is an excellent presentation on the problems of government 'regulations' into free market mechanisms. This book illustrates simply and clearly how many chaotic economic problems were caused by interference from government regulations and how capitalism has overcome them. Master this book and you have overcome most of the bad economic thinking of our time. Government is the cause of capitalism failure.

What Has Government Done to Our Money?

Rothbard gives us an exceptionally clear, detailed description of what money is and how it has come to be manipulated by governments and central bankers into almost worthless inflationary fiat paper currency. He then explains how gold became the most respected and trustworthy currency of choice and the prospect of either hyperinflation or the greatest depression the world has ever seen may be arriving in the very near future.

The Case Against the Fed

This book, written by Murray Rothbard, an economist and historian of fairly well known repute, is a scathing attack on not only the Federal Reserve, but the interests that created this institution. Rothbard explains how the Federal Reserve is the true source in the destruction of wealth, which has led to the destruction of the middle class and continues to sift money into the hands of the wealthiest.