Twitter   RSS   Email  

Curtis Ophoven's eBooks

 Why America May Never Recover From the Recession


 Save Money Homeschooling


Cap-and-Trade Legislation Will Cost Millions of Jobs

By: Curtis Ophoven

6/5/2009 - 4 Comments

The Obama administration is in the process of pushing new legislation through congress to add a new tax to all coal producers under the assumption that coal producers are behind the climate change.

The assumption is that coal producers are adding to the carbon emissions in the atmosphere that is perhaps causing the climate change.  Despite the hundreds of scientists that disagree that with this claim, Al Core has pushed this message with a book and movie and has investing millions into green energy companies.

Al Gore used his political influence to lead the effort against carbon fuels.  Gore was also a strong supporter of Obama, and would significantly benefit from the cap-and-trade legislation.

When questioned by Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee) last week, Gore replied that he gives every penny to a non-profit – that he of course chairs.

The cap-and-trade legislation is not going to stop carbon emissions just as cigarette tax does not stop people from smoking. If fact the government doesn't want to stop carbon emissions for the same reason they don't want people to stop smoking, because they would loose the tax revenue.   This is just another way to increase taxes without increasing the income tax. 

The legislation is estimated to cost the economy three-to-six million jobs – and cost each household between $1600 and $3300 a year in taxes. 

Government Needs More Money

The real reason behind this legislation is that the government has run out of money and needs to find new and creative ways to tax people without increasing income taxes because that is politically challenging.

The government has expanding so large that it is beyond the support of the economy.  The economy has toppled under the tax burden of the government and the government’s solution is to expand and increase the taxes even more.  The cap-and-trade legislation is an unsustainable tax burned that the economy cannot afford.  

Copyright © 2010 PennyJobs.com. All rights reserved.

<< FREE >> Weekly Newsletter...

Signup today and start receiving our free weekly newsletter!

Reader Comments

Comment 1
Land Refinancing Says: on Saturday, June 06, 2009 2:28:54 PM

I do agree that the government has no interest in cutting down their tax revenue. However, I must disagree with your stance on Climate Change.

You said that hundreds of scientist disagree with Climate Change...compared to the thousands, maybe millions, of scientist who agree that global warming is happenings and not natural.

This topic shouldn't be political but a scientific one.


Comment 2
Curt Says: on Saturday, June 06, 2009 6:17:20 PM

@Land Refinancing - I which this topic of Climate Change was not political also and remained a scientific debate.

The scientific evidence against carbon being the primary cause of the change in climate is the dramatic increase in sun spots and sun flairs in the last decade.  This additional heat and radiation produced by these sun flairs are sufficient to cause the climate change that we are experiencing. The true source of the climate change is still a debate, yet the politicians are willing to go with the the only assumption that allows them to create new taxes even in the face a the largest financial collapse in history.


Comment 3
j Says: on Friday, June 12, 2009 9:16:23 PM

Ron Paul's Statement before the US House of Representatives, June 4, 2009

"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."

"Circulated by a distinguished group of American physical scientists and supported by a definitive review of the peer-reviewed scientific literature, this may be the strongest and most widely supported statement on this subject that has been made by the scientific community. A state-by-state listing of the signers, which include 9,029 men and women with PhD degrees, a listing of their academic specialties, and a peer-reviewed summary of the science on this subject are available at www.petitionproject.org." (31,478 American scientists have signed this statement)

"The peer-reviewed summary, "Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide'' by A. B. Robinson, N. E. Robinson, and W. Soon includes 132 references to the scientific literature and was circulated with the petition." Source: http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul537.html
I will be waiting for Land Refinancing's list of the million's of scientists he claims support Al Gore's political Climate Change campaign.



Write a Comment

Please keep comments civil and on-topic. Abusive or inappropriate comments will be removed without warning.

 Name (required)   
 Email Address (required)   
 Website URL 
Comment  
 

Related Articles

  • California to cut billions in Welfare and Healthcare
  • Last week California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger proposed eliminating welfare for 500,000 families and terminating health coverage for nearly 1 million children to help close the state's ballooning budget deficit. Read More...
  • The Folly in Believing the Government Can Fix the Economy with Quick and Thoughtful Action
  • Obama and economic team are convinced that the US is a nation of abundant wealth and is only battling a temporary economic problem.  Read More...
  • Bank Stress Tests Prove Banks Are Insolvent
  • Last week the government released the results from the bank stress tests that were conducted to determine if the major US banks could survive a deepening recession. Read More...
  • How To Make Money Farming In a Global Recession
  • The world is running out of food as global food banks have reached record lows for several years now. Read More...
  • Government Takeover of GM is Unconstitutional and Illegal
  • The Obama administration has taken over a private owned company and fired its CEO and board of directors without the constitutional authority to do so. Read More...
The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century

What Friedman means by "flat" is "connected": the lowering of trade and political barriers and the exponential technical advances of the digital revolution that have made it possible to do business, or almost anything else, instantaneously with billions of other people across the planet. This book is perhaps the most popular for its historical revelation of how globalization has quickly changed India, China and America.

America Alone

In this, his first major book, Mark Steyn--probably the most widely read, and wittiest, columnist in the English-speaking world--takes on the great poison of the twenty-first century: the anti-Americanism that fuels both Old Europe and radical Islam. America, Steyn argues, will have to stand alone. The world will be divided between America and the rest; and for our sake America had better win.

The Hyperinflation Survival Guide: Strategies for American Businesses

The Hyperinflation Survival Guide offers strategies for business managers to keep their enterprise afloat in the midst of runaway inflation. Within this succinct little book are a plethora of sensible business strategies for American businesses. If businesses are to survive they must effectively counter and minimize the ill effects of rampant inflation and/or hyperinflation. The utmost prudence is required in managing accounts receivable, inventory, and production at such a time. A sudden inflationary economic downturn may very well bring a business to its knees leading to insolvency.

The Speculation Economy

American businesses today are obsessed with the price of their stock, and no wonder. The consequences of even a modest decrease can be so dire that some executives would rather damage their corporation's long-term health than allow quarterly returns to fall below projections. But how did this situation come about? When did the stock market become the driver of the American economy? Lawrence E. Mitchell identifies the moment in American history when finance triumphed over industry.