Twitter   RSS   Email  

Curtis Ophoven's eBooks

 Why America May Never Recover From the Recession


 Save Money Homeschooling


Is Outsourcing the Cause of the Recession?

By: Curtis Ophoven

8/19/2008 - 16 Comments

Outsourcing America jobs was the direct result of free trade agreements like NAFTA.

The globalization process of ‘free trade’ agreements like NAFTA changed the economy of America from a once-proud exporting nation, to the world’s biggest importer – as much of the manufacturing sector of the economy was moved to other nations with lower paying workers in China and India.  In only 15 years, from 1992 to 2007, the US balance of trade deficit surged from $84 billion to $700 billion.  Today, most of the jobs in America are in the service sector – as we server one another.  But, this is about to change.

Globalization Has Run Its Course

The globalization process can be traced all the way back to the end of World War II, when nations began creating economic treaties to reduce the risk of another dictator from creating an extreme form of nationalism. The idea was to create trade agreements to couple together the economies of independent nations – which increased GDP in exchange for lowering the risk of war, because a nation is much less likely to go to war with another nation whom their economy depends upon.

Each agreement brought financial benefits in exchange for economic independence. After 50 years, the globalization process had run most of its course along with the economic benefits. The nations that benefited the most were of course the nations with high unemployment and low wages, as they became the producers of the world (like China and India).

The Benefits Have Been Consumed

Some say that America should not have taken part in the globalization process. Some say we should have not have traded financial benefits for economic dependence. But to truth is that America has enjoyed economic growth for decade by leveraging the dollar as the Reserve Currency of the world which allowed America to continue to increase its currency as globalization brought more and more demand for dollars throughout the world. Very few complained about the economic expansion that each new trade agreement brought or the lower prices produced by other nations. Low prices leader Wal-Mart became the largest retail chain in the world.

Globalization has been the biggest factor in the last decade of increase in productivity and growth around the world.  But now that globalization has run its course, the financial benefits have also run their course. The free ride is over.  In the global economy, America needs to compete with the low wages of the rest of the world. Capitalism has been embraced by the world, and America now has to work for a living just like everyone else. It's easy to look back and blame outsourcing because we have declining job growth, but our declining job growth is purely a result of spending more money than the goods that we are producing. America needs to rebuild our manufacturing sector and once again become a nation with high exports. To do that, we will have to settle for lower paying jobs and will need to once again turn our attention to education.  Education is the key to higher wage jobs, as education was the foundation of America’s productivity 40 years ago.

The global recession that is upon us was not caused by outsourcing. It is a direct result of America taking advantage of the fact that the dollar is the world reverse currency by borrowing and spending much more money than we are producing goods for.  We were able to do this by increasing the supply of dollars and trading them for goods to the rest of the world - otherwise known as OIU's.

There is No Going Back

The complexity and history of policy changes and trade agreements which have coupled the economies of the world over the last several decades cannot be quickly decoupled.

To reverse globalization, tariffs would have to be put into place to block free trade between nations – which would result in a large recession as each nation could no longer export products they build or import the many products they consume at very low prices.  Each nation would have to stop the flow of free information available on the Internet which is shared by the world. Prices and energy costs would skyrocket, resulting in the largest economic crisis in history.

The best thing nations can do is move forward with;
• A strong educational system
• A strong small business tax policy
• Produce competitive products (resulting in high exports) and
• Create a strong currency policy (limiting the money supply with higher interest rates)

It can be done. America can return to its economic strength, but it’s going to take leadership and a willingness to tear down some of the strongholds within our nation. We need to rebuild the educational system and stop congressional spending on social programs based on the false idea that prosperity and good health are basic rights.

Copyright © 2010 PennyJobs.com. All rights reserved.

<< FREE >> Weekly Newsletter...

Signup today and start receiving our free weekly newsletter!

Reader Comments

Comment 1
Kyle Says: on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:59:59 AM

Excellent post and I couldn't agree more. Instead of complaining about outsourcing, we should spend our time figuring out ways to compete in the global market. We can't compete on wages, so we must figure out how to add value in other ways. Fostering the creation of new technology and increasing productivity are our best bets, and education is the most direct path towards these goals.

Comment 2
Andy Says: on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:03:31 PM

Great post. Outsourcing is subject to the same forces of supply and demand. So in time, the US will get back what it gave as India and China get richer. They key, like you said, is to focus on a strong educational system and a progressive/condusive business environment.


Comment 3
Justin Says: on Sunday, October 19, 2008 8:55:53 AM

To Kyle, I would say the value is that we can provide a better product 9 times out of 10. A lot of the problem is that, due to these 'competitive pricing' issues, a lot of places cannot afford it, or are more than willing to settle for a bargain basement quality of service for rock bottom prices.

As I'm sure most are aware, a huge payout goes in the form of most of our country's IT support industry. It's really ridiculous how we keep outsourcing all of our IT jobs overseas and then wonder why all of our children just want to be 'ganstas' or rappers instead of using their intelligence to make a living.

I've been working in IT for over 5 years now and I've had to watch too many of my friends and coworkers get laid off only so their job can get shipped overseas, or so the company can save a crappy 25k a year and make a slightly better profit margin in comparison to our 'best shore' site locations.

The global market isn't the issue, it's the these CEO's who saunter from one CEO job with one company to another and in the process outsource or fire thousands to hundreds of thousands of Americans. They then sell the company to the first bidder they can find, pocket a huge golden parachute, and vanish shortly after the deal is complete.

Our IT workforce, for the most part, is strong and willing. The problem is that opportunities are being ripped out from under us so that Execs can get paid millions to billions of dollars to play golf on Monday morning while their employees are stuck with 200+ calls coming through from India and trying to explain to them how to do their damn jobs only to find out the next day that your job is going over too.

Once we outsource all of our IT to India, who's going to tell them how to do their jobs then?


Comment 4
Truthseeker Says: on Sunday, December 07, 2008 1:19:44 AM

It's Dec. 2008. What I have been predicting regarding outsourcing is now happening. I'm in IT & I just got laid off. I'm not a slouch and neither are the others who also got laid off. The managers are still there providing no value since they have no skills, but that is a separate issue about office politics and how capitalism rewards the suck-ups, not the productive workers.

70% of the US economy is based on consumer spending. With all the information outsourcing, we don't have enough middle class job creation to keep up with our population growth.

So we have less spending like we do now. So companies will outsource more and the cycle will intensify.

The argument to invest in education to reverse the trend is flawed. The jobs requiring education are all going to India, not here.

When people can get degrees and experience, but cannot maintain employment due to cost cutting, they will lose faith in the system.

So to all you people out there who think you are safe... you will also lose your job. It is just a matter of time.

What we need is a new politicl party that will work for the middle class. This party will enforce a tax on outsourcing, patrol out borders, and discourage population growth to help labor, the environment, and our quality of life.


Comment 5
Curt Says: on Sunday, December 07, 2008 9:09:38 AM

@Truthseeker -

You may very well be right. I work in Software development and there is a good chance, perhaps a 50/50 chance, that I will get laid off sometime next year - 2009.


Comment 6
Unemployed IT worker Says: on Sunday, December 07, 2008 12:43:52 PM

Outsourcing IS the cause of the global recession. As far as Americans having to work for a living now. We are the most productive workers in the world.

We are also the people who've over consumed using credit and made all these companies profitable. Now they want to shoot themselves in the foot and move all our jobs overseas but still expect us to purchase their goods and services. This is the result. All those people using their house as collateral(equity loans etc...) never thought their house would lose value.

Im an IT worker and every job Ive had was outsourced to India. I was praised by all my managers and always received raises up to the point my job was outsourced. Why not ask if I would take a pay cut? So I was a productive asset to the company I worked for but that means nothing these days. Not sure how education would of helped? The education excuse is such a weak argument. Youre really saying Americans cant do these jobs? Naive

The cause of our recession is inflation. Money is all relative to the value we place on it. We COULD compete if our cost of living was the same as India and China. There is some adjustment going on right now with the real estate market.

Not sure but it sounds like the author gets their economic information from the Fox Business Channel or Sean Hannity?


Comment 7
truthseeker Says: on Sunday, December 07, 2008 4:44:18 PM

I thik it would be best if everyone stopped going negative on president Bush and Fox news and started focussing on a workable plan for the US.

Technology is on the verge of reaching its potential for replacing workers. The internet has replaced travel agents and you can scan your own groceries now. Soon, fast food will be made by machines, etc.

That would be OK if the information jobs to create and support new technology would stay in the US, but we all know they won't.

The United States will colapse under this new world order due to income taxes dropping and increased welfare demands. Please think about this: education does not create jobs, it only fills jobs that already exist.

The author made logical assumptions based on the past economies. The problem is that when most Americans go broke and homeless without health insurance, there won't be any customers for the businesses that survive up to that point.


Comment 8
Curt Says: on Sunday, December 07, 2008 8:49:29 PM

@Unemployed IT worker -

You have some good points, but the education that I'm refer to is not just in IT. We need to increase our educational system across the board. And education is only one of my four points to economic growth.

Part of the reason our college graduates (like IT professionals) need higher wages is because our educational system is so expensive. $30k per year is the average college tuition.

The government is partly to blame for the high cost because they have empowered the higher educational system to increase their tuition by giving out government loans to everyone. If everyone couldn't get the money to go to college, colleges would be forced to lower their tuition or go out of business. This is now what is about to take place, as college loans dry up. Just last week Harvard's fund raising operation said they were down $8 billion last quarter alone.

I don't completely understand why companies don't offer pay cuts. I think its because the marketplace still demands higher pay, so if they lower your pay it will only be a temporary solution as they know you will find another job for higher pay. Also, it could cause a chain reaction with other departments as they would all be force to lower their pay - or everyone would just request a transfer to higher paying departments within a larger organization.


Comment 9
Curt Says: on Sunday, December 07, 2008 9:01:05 PM

@truthseeker -

You said, "The problem is that when most Americans go broke and homeless without health insurance, there won't be any customers for the businesses that survive up to that point. "

I totally agree, but Americans are already broke they just don't realize it yet. Living on credit cards and home equity loans is broke. The businesses that are part of the service sector have no customers and most of them will fail. We need to start producing things again.

We need cheaper, higher quality education in manufacturing and industrial engineering. We need a new industrial revolution.


Comment 10
truthseeker Says: on Monday, January 05, 2009 5:00:30 PM

If you pay attention to what the politicians are talking about now, they have given up on profit seeking companies to provide jobs. They now want the govt to create jobs, where in the past, they tried to help for-profit companies to expand their workforce. That can't work in the long run since borrowing forever is not an option. Watch global warming-job creation/borowing to pay for it $$$ go into the mega trillions. Every company will depend on govt subsidies and at that point, the govt will hopefully place outsourcing restrictions and restrictions on management compensation.



Comment 11
Willis Says: on Monday, January 26, 2009 2:52:01 PM

Nice article – but wrong.

Outsourcing did not create this recession but it made it much worse.

The fault lies with publically traded companies. Greedy stock holders do not understand the importance of engineering, programming and manufacturing and why you can’t build a stand-alone economy without them.

We need to invest in privately owned companies and start-ups. They are free of Wall Street’s simplistic labor cost saving solutions (outsourcing).

If the author thinks we had high growth (which turned out to be a bubble) he needs to look at the numbers :

USA goes to a service economy = 2% annual growth.
China goes to a manufacturing based economy =- 11% growth.

Where would you put your money?


Comment 12
Curt Says: on Monday, January 26, 2009 9:42:14 PM

@Willis - Greed is always a factor in business, and it played a part, but this recession was primarily the result of government central planning of the economy. In short, bad monetary policy.

Greed is also what drives new business development .Obama is over blaming 'greedy' wall-street because he needs someone to blame other then the government policies that he is continuing to support.  Here is an article I wrote about this; Blaming Free Market Capitalism


Comment 13
Willis Says: on Sunday, February 01, 2009 9:54:22 PM

I think that it is obvious that unchecked greed has played a major part.

The Gorden Gecko chant "greed is good" is not exactly true. Starting a new business is not usually a matter of greed - that's a cynical view - many people create businesses as an act of creativity and personal fulfillment - I've known many like that.

In fact there has never been a pure free market. Every emerging economy has had to play dirty tricks and employ protections to compete. Germany did it to the UK in the early 20th Century - they counterfeited machinery and violated patents.
England was forced to protect itself.
Some could argue that Germany was just practicing free capitalism. We have always set trade conditions - specifically to protect our system from the ravages of greed. What's good for business and what's good for the country are not always the same thing. Selling vital technology is lucrative, but stupid from a security standpoint.


Comment 14
truthseeker Says: on Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:59:39 AM

Obama said last night that we all need finish high school and have access to college. He still doesn't get it. Companies are still outsourcing to India while they claim they can't find qualified Americans - which is a lie. In time, people will know what I know. You can't have a healthy American economy without jobs here in America.

Comment 16
puja Says: on Friday, December 25, 2009 9:21:21 AM

US govt. has to apply tax on outsouce job.

Write a Comment

Please keep comments civil and on-topic. Abusive or inappropriate comments will be removed without warning.

 Name (required)   
 Email Address (required)   
 Website URL 
Comment  
 

Related Articles

  • Surprise, Surprise: Inflation Doubles Expectations to 5.6%
  • The U.S. Labor Department reported Thursday that consumer prices rose by 0.8% last month, twice the 0.4% gain that economists had been expecting. Read More...
  • Blaming Free Market Capitalism
  • The impact of the financial markets of the world has caused the notion of ‘free market capitalism’ to come under fire.  After all, if capitalism is so great, then why did it lead us into this financial crisis? Read More...
  • Investment Advice: Consumers are Broke and Inflation is Running Wild
  • In the first quarter of 2008, our nation’s net worth declined $1.7 trillion dollars according to the Federal Reverse. Read More...
  • Who Should Provide Financial Education?
  • Your financial education could be the key to your family’s financial future. Read More...
  • Dollar Has No Where to go but Down
  • On Friday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, said “We’ve Turned the Corner”, “We're closer to the end of the credit crisis than we are to the beginning”. Read More...
The Speculation Economy

American businesses today are obsessed with the price of their stock, and no wonder. The consequences of even a modest decrease can be so dire that some executives would rather damage their corporation's long-term health than allow quarterly returns to fall below projections. But how did this situation come about? When did the stock market become the driver of the American economy? Lawrence E. Mitchell identifies the moment in American history when finance triumphed over industry.

U.S. Manufacturing: The Engine for Growth in a Global Economy

This volume provides a comprehensive analysis of the essential role of the manufacturing sector of the US economy. The increase in the relative importance of the service sector and the globalization of manufacturing has tended to dull the image of US manufacturing....This volume contains much useful data that has been condensed into tables and charts to provide support to the reader without interrupting the flow of the text.

The Hyperinflation Survival Guide: Strategies for American Businesses

The Hyperinflation Survival Guide offers strategies for business managers to keep their enterprise afloat in the midst of runaway inflation. Within this succinct little book are a plethora of sensible business strategies for American businesses. If businesses are to survive they must effectively counter and minimize the ill effects of rampant inflation and/or hyperinflation. The utmost prudence is required in managing accounts receivable, inventory, and production at such a time. A sudden inflationary economic downturn may very well bring a business to its knees leading to insolvency.

Freedom: America's Competitive Advantage in the Global Market

Gamble argues that globalization brings far more benefits to the U.S. economy than it takes away. Gamble shows that both Europe and emerging economic powers like China and India have serious long-terms problems linked to their cultures, political structures, occasional instability, and state ownership of companies. These and other factors will eventually put a brake on the economic growth of hot emerging economies. The fundamental protections of property and free speech, a culture that promotes and rewards entrepreneurship, banking policies that make capital easily available, are still more supportive of economic growth and wealth creation than can be found anywhere else.